Status: ExperimentalGraph ReasoningEvidence, Audit and Replay
Graph Reasoning Runtime
An experimental reasoning runtime separating a planner, a transaction log and an evidence ledger, with constraint enforcement over structured domain knowledge.
Abstract
We are prototyping a reasoning runtime in which planning is separated from execution: a planner proposes steps, a transaction log records them, and an evidence ledger keeps supporting material alongside intermediate state. Domain packs supply structured knowledge and constraints. The aim is reproducible, inspectable reasoning; this is an early experimental system, not a product.
Problem & motivation
Free-form LLM reasoning is hard to reproduce or audit: intermediate steps are not recorded in a structured, replayable way, and domain constraints are applied inconsistently.
Research questions
- Does separating planning from a transaction log improve reproducibility of multi-step reasoning?
- Can domain constraints be enforced without collapsing the reasoning space unhelpfully?
Methods
- Implement a planner / transaction-log / evidence-ledger separation.
- Encode domain packs with explicit constraints.
- Replay logged runs to test determinism.
Limitations
- Experimental; interfaces and results are unstable and may change substantially.
- No performance claims; no external benchmark has been run.
Disclosures
- Funding
- Infrastructure support provided by Octopus Core Pty Ltd.
- Conflicts of interest
- No specific commercial conflict identified for this experimental line.
